Indian authorities have issued a strict directive to smartphone manufacturers. They must now pre-install a government-run cybersecurity application on all devices sold in the country.
This controversial move prohibits users from uninstalling the software. Consequently, it has triggered significant alarm regarding data privacy and state surveillance.
India currently has a mobile user base exceeding 1.16 billion people. The government argues that this mandatory app is necessary to protect these citizens from fraud and theft.
The 90-Day Ultimatum
New Delhi has given manufacturers a 90-day window to comply with the new regulations. The rule stipulates that the app, known as “Sanchar Saathi” (Communication Partner), must be on every handset. This applies to phones manufactured in or imported to India.
The directive explicitly states that the software must be “readily visible and accessible” during the initial device setup. Crucially, the order mandates that users cannot disable or restrict the app’s functionalities.
For devices already in circulation, the government has instructed manufacturers to push the application to users via software updates.
Safety vs. Surveillance
Government officials maintain that the app is a public safety tool. Its primary functions include:
- Tracking Devices: Helping users block and trace lost or stolen phones.
- Fraud Prevention: Allowing citizens to identify and disconnect fake mobile subscriptions registered in their names.
Authorities claim the system has already successfully traced millions of missing devices. However, digital rights advocates and political opponents have condemned the order.
They warn of serious implications for civil liberties, arguing that the directive dangerously expands executive control over personal devices.
“Big Brother” Concerns
Cybersecurity analysts have raised red flags regarding the mandate. They describe the forced installation as a clear invasion of privacy.
Concerns center on the potential for the app to access unencrypted files and private messages. Furthermore, experts fear that future updates could covertly expand surveillance capabilities without user consent.
Opposition leaders have demanded an immediate rollback of the order. They labeled the move unconstitutional and described the non-removable software as a “dystopian tool.” Critics argue it is designed to monitor the movements and decisions of every citizen, drawing comparisons to a “Big Brother” surveillance state.
UK Agrees to Higher NHS Drug Prices in Zero-Tariff Deal with US
