In a significant judicial development that has captured the attention of the nation, the Appeals Court of Tunis has delivered a revised verdict in the high-profile case involving former Prime Minister Ali Larayedh. On Thursday evening, the court officially reduced Larayedh’s prison sentence from 34 years to 24 years.
While the reduction offers a ten-year decrease from the original penalty, the ruling solidifies the state’s stance on a controversy that has shadowed Tunisian politics for over a decade.
The case centers on what has become known in Tunisia as the “Tasfir” affair a term used to describe the organized facilitation and transportation of Tunisian citizens to conflict zones in Syria during the height of the Syrian civil war.
Larayedh, who served as the nation’s Prime Minister between 2013 and 2014, was accused of utilizing his administrative power to aid these movements, which involved thousands of young Tunisians joining various militant groups abroad.
The Road to the Appeals Verdict
The legal journey for the former head of government has been long and fraught with political tension. The initial trial concluded in May 2025, where a lower court confirmed the maximum penalty of 34 years in prison, as requested by the prosecution. However, the legal team for the former Prime Minister immediately filed an appeal, challenging both the severity of the sentence and the validity of the evidence presented.
During the session on Thursday evening, the Appeals Court of Tunis remained firm on the guilty verdict but chose to mitigate the duration of the incarceration. By lowering the term by ten years, the court acknowledged a different interpretation of the sentencing guidelines, though it did not overturn the fundamental charges brought against Larayedh.
The prosecution’s original argument rested on the premise that, during his tenure, Larayedh oversaw a period of lax border controls and administrative oversight that allowed recruitment networks to flourish. They argued that his actions or lack thereof—constituted a direct contribution to the rise of regional extremism.
Political Fallout and the Ennahda Response
The sentencing has sparked a fierce reaction from Ennahda, the Islamist opposition party to which Larayedh belongs. In a strongly worded statement, the party denounced the court’s decision, labeling the entire judicial process as “politically motivated.”
Ennahda has consistently maintained that Larayedh is a victim of a broader campaign to dismantle the political structures established after the Arab Spring. Party leaders pointed out that the first trial in 2025 was marred by significant doubts regarding the “solid proof” behind the accusations. They argue that the evidence is circumstantial and that the former Prime Minister is being held responsible for the complex geopolitical realities of the 2013-2014 era rather than specific criminal acts.
This case is viewed by many observers as a litmus test for the independence of the Tunisian judiciary in the post-revolutionary era. Critics of the government suggest that high-profile trials of former leaders are intended to consolidate current power, while supporters of the verdict argue that it is a necessary step toward accountability for the security failures of the past.
The Broader Scope of the “Tasfir” Case
Ali Larayedh was not the only individual facing judgment on Thursday. The “Tasfir” case is a sprawling investigation involving dozens of officials, recruiters, and logistical coordinators. Alongside the former Prime Minister, seven other individuals received their final verdicts during the same session.
The sentences for these co-defendants ranged significantly:
- The most lenient sentence was set at three years.
- The most severe sentence reached 28 years in prison.
These varied penalties reflect the different levels of involvement alleged by the state, from ground-level recruiters to high-ranking officials who allegedly provided the political cover for the networks to operate. The collective sentencing signals the government’s intent to close the chapter on the recruitment pipelines that once saw Tunisia become one of the largest sources of foreign fighters in the Syrian conflict.
Contextualizing Ali Larayedh’s Legacy
To understand the weight of this sentence, one must look at the specific period of Larayedh’s leadership. He took office in 2013, a time of immense transition and instability following the 2011 Arab Spring. His administration was tasked with navigating a fragile democracy while managing an explosion of political and religious fervor.
During his year in power, the country faced several internal crises, including political assassinations and a rising tide of domestic radicalization. His detractors have long claimed that his government was too lenient on extremist elements, while his supporters argue that he was operating in a chaotic environment where the state’s security apparatus was still in a state of reconstruction.
Conclusion: A Nation Divided by Its Past
The reduction of Ali Larayedh’s sentence to 24 years is a landmark moment in Tunisia’s modern history. For the families of those who never returned from the Syrian conflict, the verdict represents a measure of justice and accountability for the systems that allowed their loved ones to leave. For the political opposition, it represents the silencing of a key figure from the revolutionary era.
As Larayedh begins his term, the debate over the “Tasfir” affair will likely continue to dominate the national conversation. Tunisia remains a country deeply reflective of its recent past, constantly weighing the need for security and accountability against the principles of political pluralism and judicial transparency. Whether this verdict brings closure or further division remains to be seen.
READ ALSO: U.S.-Iran Nuclear Talks: Geneva Standoff Reaches Critical Turn
